Talk:Princess of Cannock

Add topic
There are no discussions on this page.

This is not a significant character in Dragon Quest II. She is named (obviously) but does not play any part in the overall plot of the game. In other words, she is too insignificant to merit an article. --Pagoda 19:58, December 8, 2009 (UTC)

EVERY character, EVERY monster, EVERY spell should have an article. Even if it is a small character which a lot of characters are in Dragon Quest.--BigCubby 12:38, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

I agree about monsters and spells, but I think there has to be some sort of standard for characters. I have no problem saying that every 'named' character should have an article, or that every 'significant' character should have an article. The Princess of Cannock is neither. Can you be more clear what you define as a 'character'? --Pagoda 14:12, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

I am at a little mess up here because I have never played the game but just judging by the title of the article then I would say she is a little bit worth of an article just because of the "Princess" title. However I am not sure what the guidelines are or what it should be but the "Princess" part really makes me think she deserves an article. However I have never played the game, at least to this part.--BigCubby 14:19, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

I had honestly forgotten that the Prince of Cannock had a sister and thought that this was just a typo or somethin'. While I suppose every character should get their due, it might be easier to just include the Princess of Cannock in the character list of the Dragon Quest II page and mention her in the Prince of Cannock's page, especially if she plays so little a role that she's nearly as remarkable as a town resident.--PantheonSasuke 15:02, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
Return to "Princess of Cannock" page.