Template talk:Stub: Difference between revisions

From Dragon Quest Wiki
(commented on poor interaction with spoiler templates.)
 
(→‎Rollback: new section)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
This template interacts ''very'' badly with the spoiler template - expand the spoiler at [[List_of_treasure_map_monster_ranks_in_Dragon_Quest_IX]] to see how.
This template interacts ''very'' badly with the spoiler template - expand the spoiler at [[List_of_treasure_map_monster_ranks_in_Dragon_Quest_IX]] to see how.
[[User:FluffyMormegil|FluffyMormegil]] 19:51, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
[[User:FluffyMormegil|FluffyMormegil]] 19:51, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
== Rollback ==
I am proposing a rollback of this template to the [http://dragonquest.wikia.com/index.php?title=Template:Stub&action=edit&oldid=27467 previous major version].  My reasons are:
* It breaks compatibility with the spoiler template as shown in the above link.
* It uses a background color which clashes with most of the colors of this wiki.
* It is ambiguous and unclear that it is marking a page as a stub.
* It is large and obtrusive on the pages it appears.
* It in no way enhances the functionality and purpose for this template on the wiki.
If Snstar2006 or others feel differently, please state your reasons for why this version is better than the last one.  In my opinion these changes were done "for change sake" and do not truly improve the template.  These sorts of changes are frowned upon by me and wiki communities in general. --[[User:Pagoda|Pagoda]] 21:38, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:38, 7 September 2010

This template interacts very badly with the spoiler template - expand the spoiler at List_of_treasure_map_monster_ranks_in_Dragon_Quest_IX to see how. FluffyMormegil 19:51, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Rollback[edit]

I am proposing a rollback of this template to the previous major version. My reasons are:

  • It breaks compatibility with the spoiler template as shown in the above link.
  • It uses a background color which clashes with most of the colors of this wiki.
  • It is ambiguous and unclear that it is marking a page as a stub.
  • It is large and obtrusive on the pages it appears.
  • It in no way enhances the functionality and purpose for this template on the wiki.

If Snstar2006 or others feel differently, please state your reasons for why this version is better than the last one. In my opinion these changes were done "for change sake" and do not truly improve the template. These sorts of changes are frowned upon by me and wiki communities in general. --Pagoda 21:38, September 7, 2010 (UTC)